City Beneath the Sea was a rather cheesy affair that hearkened back to Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea and likely would have delivered a very similar type of show.
What Is It?
City Beneath the Sea takes place in the year 2053 and centers around the undersea city named Pacifica. The pilot film delivers a mostly action-adventure romp that involves an attempt to steal the U.S. gold reserves which have been moved from Fort Knox to Pacifica. Subsequent adventures would likely have followed a similar action-oriented focus, concentrating on the inhabitants of the underwater city and the struggles they faced.
Aired: NBC, 1971
Created By: Irwin Allen
Starring: Stuart Whitman, Rosemary Forsyth, Robert Colbert, Burr DeBenning, Robert Wagner
Why Didn’t it Fly?
Back in the 1960’s, producer Irwin Allen was king of cheesy sci fi with four separate series that aired from 1964 to 1970: Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea, Lost in Space, Time Tunnel, and Land of the Giants. Shortly after the last of those shows went off the air, Allen took a shot at another sci fi entry and headed back underwater like his first series. He originally did an hour-long pilot which had a different story and was set in 2068. Nothing came of that, but he was given the greenlight to do a two-hour telefilm which aired as a movie of the week. That apparently did not pull in high enough ratings to justify what would certainly be an expensive show to produce, and NBC did not order it to series.
Would It Have Worked as a Series?
It might have been interesting to see where the series would have gone and they could have possibly tied it to Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea as existing in a future version of the same world (Richard Basehart guest-starred in the movie but not as Admiral Nelson, plus the movie borrowed the flying sub from the series). However, while Voyage started out with a more serious action-adventure tone before descending into high camp in its later seasons, City already had a head start on the camp angle. With Allen heading the show, it would have likely quickly morphed into tales of the arch-villain/sea monster of the week ravaging the Pacifica.
But for fans of Allen’s particular brand of sci fi, the pilot is probably worth checking out as a hold-over from the same style of show he did in the ’60s, leaning closer to the camp of Voyage and Lost in Space as opposed to the more straight-forward adventures in Time Tunnel and Land of the Giants.
Where Can You Watch It?
The television movie has been released on DVD by Warner Archives and is worth a look for some retro-sci fi fun from a simpler era. It is also streaming for free (with ads) on Amazon FreeVee service.
Read about more Sci Fi TV pilots that did not fly at this link.
CancelledSciFi.com: Keep up with the status updates of all the currently airing sci fi and fantasy shows with our Cancellation Watch posts. And be sure to follow the Cancelled Sci Fi Twitter Site for breaking news and updates.
SciFiTVSite.com: Follow our Sci Fi TV Schedule for all the currently airing and upcoming sci fi and fantasy television shows, and you can see the premieres for all the upcoming genre entries at this link.
Chloe
Thank you for the Tribute to Irwin and his shows. Theres a Life and a Spirit here lacking in today s heavy handed and CGI driven fantasy fare. Despite the interest in putting these efforts aside, they won’t stay down.
And thanks to all at this Website for offering to discuss Irwin s shows even if you’re NAF.
I have “City Beneath the Sea”, both the presentation episode, and this movie on DVD. The movie flows much better as a feature film, w/o the ads. Reminder: this was made the year before Irwin Allen made his triumphant return to the big screen with both, “The Poseidon Adventure”, and “The Towering Inferno”. I have all of the series sets of all of Mr. Allen’s sci-fi series of the 60s. I suggest that if you have any/all of them, set aside a day/night to binge watch them. Many disagree, but Irwin Allen was one of the A-list producer/directors of all-time. I hope there’s a star on Hollywood Boulevard in his honor. If there isn’t, the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce is making a grave mistake in doing so.
Hello
In this entry it says “but he was given the greenlight to do a two hour telefilm which aired as a movie of the week”.
Could you please clear up a point of confusion (at least for me). A “two hour telefilm” – is that the running length of the film alone or does it also include ads, station id breaks etc.?
That means it fits within two hours on the Prime Time schedule. So it includes adds, etc. It was released theatrically, but I don’t know if that had added footage that made it longer.