The only thing . . . that future is not quite upon us yet.
While I believe that social media will become increasingly more important as a means of gauging a show’s audience and I believe that Netflix and Amazon (and possibly other alternatives like pre-funding) will successfully save cancelled shows (some, not all of them), the fact is that we haven’t seen much evidence of it just yet. Oh, there’s some hints that change is in the air, and I will be looking at that further in an upcoming post. But if you look back at several of the cancellations from last season, you will find that the old, ratings-driven model is still firmly in place (as well as poor decision-making by the networks). And those streaming services and upstart cable/internet channels have not been so quick to come in and save these doomed shows.
So with the viable options available, why is the change not happening as quickly as we think it should? One reason is that the entertainment industry–like any well entrenched industry–is slow to change. Network executives are most comfortable using the overnight ratings as their measuring stick because that’s what they have done for many years. And the sponsors–whose advertising revenue pays the production costs of these shows–continue to accept those figures even though more data has become available of late. But even as we get numbers on things like social media activity related to a show, that frontier has not been monetized yet (trust me, they are working fast and furious on it) so at this point it offers a few more stats on the PowerPoint slide (just like DVR viewing), but no money to the bottom line.
So where does that leave us? Still in the same rut as before with the Nielsen overnight ratings primarily focused on the 18-49 demographic driving the decision-making of the network executives.
And why hasn’t Netflix or Amazon saved any of the shows that came out on the wrong end of those ratings (to be fair, Yahoo did save Community after its cancellation last season)? One reason may be cost. The broadcast network shows tend to be pretty pricey and the streaming services may not be willing to ante up that much dough or they may not have enough room in their budgets with all the other original programming they are currently working on. And you can also blame Hollywood’s short attention span. If a show doesn’t succeed right away, then they lose interest pretty quickly and decide to move on to the next thing. They figure it’s pointless to throw money at a “failure” when the next big hit might be about to walk through the door (and in doing so they ignore the millions upon millions they waste each year by not showing a little patience).
I hear plenty of people tell me–especially those within the industry–that the overnight ratings alone do not determine the success or failure of a show. They cite many of the new metrics I have mentioned above and more. And yet I still see little evidence to suggest that those overnights are not the single biggest set of numbers that drive the decisions of the network execs. Here are several examples from last season:
Almost Human (Cancelled by FOX after one season): This show gives the classic example of network bungling and poor decision-making. It was hampered by poor scheduling (a late Fall debut, frequent preemptions, episodes aired out of order), yet it still did relatively well despite the hurdles and showed signs of growing its audience in early 2014 before the preemptions killed its momentum. And its average rating based on the overnights in the 18-49 demo were not that bad when compared to the rest of FOX’s shows for the season. But its numbers were not that great either–especially when they appeared on that PowerPoint slide in the boardroom–and so FOX cancelled it. I would have thought that any of a number of other channels (even the broadcast nets) as well as the streaming services would have immediately raised their hands to pick up the show. And I even heard rumors to that effect early on. But it is just as cancelled now as it was at the end of last season and I do not see any momentum towards continuing this one for another season.
Dracula (Cancelled by NBC after one season): This was billed as a limited-run “event” series, but that was a bait-and-switch as it was built to run for multiple seasons evidenced by the cliffhanger it ended on. And it actually did not do that poorly for its timeslot, Friday’s low-viewership 10 PM EST hour. Its numbers were actually better than Hannibal which would run in that hour in the Spring, but the latter received a renewal notice while Dracula received a stake in the heart (though to be fair, Hannibal will be showing up in my later post proving that change is coming). And this was another show that generated some buzz on the social networks and attracted a small but active fanbase. With the show’s name recognition and its international production arrangement (a factor that has kept Hannibal going despite its poor ratings), you would have thought Dracula would have been snatched up by another network or the streaming services. But despite a raucous campaign by its fans, nothing yet and no real reason for hope at this point.
Revolution (Cancelled by NBC after two seasons): This series was considered a hit when it first appeared in Fall 2012, but by the end of its first year its numbers had dropped to less than half those of its debut. NBC still renewed it for a second season, but they moved it from its cushy post-The Voice timeslot and shuffled it to the family friendly Wednesday 8 PM EST timeslot which did not fit well with the show’s darker tone. Not surprisingly, the ratings fell even further and continued to sink through its second season. Despite its declining ratings, the show’s fanbase made plenty of noise on the social networks and pushed hard to get it to trend high on Twitter each week. But when the schedule for the 2014-15 was set, NBC found no place for Revolution. The fans have since carried on a passionate #RelocateRevolution campaign, but I have seen no movement yet toward a pickup for a third season.
Believe (Cancelled by NBC after one season): This series pulled decent numbers when its premiere episode aired in the lead-out timeslot from The Voice. And the smart thing for NBC to have done would have been to leave it there for a few more weeks to help it build up an audience. Instead, they moved it right away to its regularly scheduled Sunday 9 PM hour where it had to contend with ABC’s surprise hit Resurrection as well as AMC’s ratings juggernaut The Walking Dead. To nobody’s surprise, Believe fell fast and far in the ratings. And despite its pedigree (it had J.J. Abrams and Alfonso Cuarón as producers), the show was mercilessly given the ax by the end of the season.
It’s still possible that one or more of these shows could be saved by Netflix, Amazon, another network, or some other suitor, but as the months pass by that becomes less and less likely as they fall further out of the entertainment industry’s short attention span (and the cast and crew find other work). Still, the fact is that show’s like the above-mentioned Hannibal as well as Syfy’s Haven may point to the new direction I expect the television industry to go in the future (more on that in an upcoming post). But for fans of the shows detailed above as well as other cancelled genre entries of late like Intelligence, 666 Park Avenue, Stargate: Universe and more, they are left suffering the effects of the old school Nielsen Ratings driven system and wondering when and if the television landscape will ever change.